Show all posts by user

Re: Are these new Jaguars, Dolphins jerseys? - 3 months ago

Is Khan trying to make the Jags look like the Rams?

Re: I disagree look at the money Manning got - 3 months ago

The difference I see is that Peyton could go anywhere and succeed. Brady knows he needs to be in New England.

Re: I See why so many GMs commenting on QBs are jobless - 3 months ago

Quoteits not like they will be hired tomorrow by any team.Pioli and Tannenbaum are sitting there because Cosell just got a job with Cleveland. These guys would much rather be in a front office than on a tv set IMO.

Re: Add up the TOTAL completions to Ho Ho, Fells and Salas in NE and get back to me...nm - 4 months ago

I had to look, so I'm stealing someone's thunder I guess. Those 3 combined for 9 catches. Salas was on NE & PHI and didn't have a catch. Sort of supports the idea that recent Rams receivers wouldn't even be playing, much less starting on other teams.

Re: Some might enjoy this article about the hx of Rams - 4 months ago

Good stuff, thanks for the link.

Re: Re:Cassel was benched man...he's a bum.....NM - 4 months ago

QuoteRFIP Quotemoklerman Perhaps, but he's proven that under decent circumstances he can produce. Specifically with Bowe. So, Bowe shouldn't have any qualms about Cassel being the QB. KC had a ton of injuries in addition to their poor front office decisions so it's no surprise to me that Cassel took a step back last year. I would not be at all surprised if Cassels is released and Reid makes

Re: Re:Cassel was benched man...he's a bum.....NM - 4 months ago

Perhaps, but he's proven that under decent circumstances he can produce. Specifically with Bowe. So, Bowe shouldn't have any qualms about Cassel being the QB. KC had a ton of injuries in addition to their poor front office decisions so it's no surprise to me that Cassel took a step back last year.

Re: I just wonder where those other GMs where last offseason - 4 months ago

Quotedodgerram I mean come on , the Rams held the Nr. 2 pick with RG3 there for the taking . those GMs who supposedly are all so high on SB should have come knocking down the Rams front door with insane trade offers. After all they all think SB is a franchise QB. And how often do you have a shot a such a franchise changer ? And didnt even the biggest SB fans on this board say there were no

Re: LOL, good one. - 4 months ago

QuoteSoCalRAMatic Yes, Heath Evans is a genius and I am very stupid. I'll vet my IQ is close to twice his and maybe four times yours, but I am so stupid I can hardly finish a sentence.Well, at least you're humble.

Re: He's gonna want to know who the qb is first...NM - 4 months ago

He shouldn't really have a problem with Cassel considering he led the league in receiving TD's(15) with Cassel throwing him the ball a couple of years ago.

Les Snead on NFL AM 2/12/13 - 4 months ago

Re: Don't understand the Vick comparisons - 4 months ago

Vick and Kordell also played under different rules that didn't favor offenses so much. Granted, these young guys are probably more accurate anyway but all of these QB's success is based primarily on the threat of them running. Defenses opt to contain them rather than rush them and that gives them a much better opportunity to throw the ball. Once that threat is gone or reduced, they will have t

Re: Iol ---It is hilarious - 4 months ago

Oh bullcrap. This has nothing to do with Bradford and it's quite obvious that the league had drifted far enough away from defending the read option that on the whole, NFL defenses were ill-prepared for it this year. Couple that with the years of rule changes to benefit offenses and you've got 3-4 QB's coming into the league the past couple of years doing unprecedented things. It's a fluke.

Re: I disagree - 4 months ago

Only because teams are fearful of his legs. He (and Wilson and RGIII) are benefiting greatly(right now) from defenses respecting that running ability. They aren't establishing themselves as pocket-passers who can also run they are taking advantage of the league, as a whole, being unprepared/ill-equipped to defend the read-option/pistol offense.

Re: No not really - 4 months ago

I don't think it's actually been established that these guys are pocket passers. They've all had success throwing the ball from the pocket but that, IMO, is because the defense is fearful of their legs. It doesn't mean that these QB's are actually sitting in the pocket, reading the coverage and going through progressions. In Kaepernick's case, when the field shrank, his passing really suffered

Re: I agree. We lost it - 4 months ago

Quoteoldmanram There have been a number of football people that have said that if Martz had not been so stubbern trying to prove that his passing game plan would work instead of running Marshal 25 times the Rams would have won that game.Faulk averaged 18.5 carries in 2001, so 17 carries in the Super Bowl isn't exactly a case of Martz stubbornly trying to prove a point. Not to mention the fact

Could Kroenke have interest in purchasing AEG? - 5 months ago

Silent Stan really surprised me last year when he was a finalist for the Dodgers and with the stadium issues in arbitration the whole situation is obviously more at the forefront than it's been. Quote@ArashMarkazi reports that Stan Kroenke and Patrick Soon-Shiong chatting it up at halftime of the Lakers-Nuggets game tonight. We hope Stan is enjoying his time at Staples Center before heading to

Re: He a really good coach with the greatest QB... - 5 months ago

Quotejemach I wonder if we will ever see how Belicheck coaches without Tom Brady. That said, Belicheck gets the optimum from what he has in place and as mentioned, puts the pedal to the metal. That is the sign of a great coach.Weren't the Patriots 11-5 or 10-6 the year Brady got hurt?

Re: Martz's technique - 5 months ago

QuoteDESERT RAM playing to win versus playing not to lose.Yep, agree 100%. He's hardly perfect but above all else, that's why I like him as a coach.

Re: Re:Oh yeah, what year was that?.... - 5 months ago

Quotelaram Quotemoklerman Quotelaram No Sam could not do that, throwing to one receiver. Like he's done with Amendola and Clayton? Bradford has no problem feeding one receiver if he trusts him and he's getting open. No reason he wouldn't feed Andre too. I wasn't aware that Sam had thrown for 4,000 yards. What year was that?You said Sam could not do that throwing to one receiver. Well, unt

Re: Re:Btw Schaub put up 4,000 b4 Foster was Foster... - 5 months ago

Quotelaram No Sam could not do that, throwing to one receiver. Like he's done with Amendola and Clayton? Bradford has no problem feeding one receiver if he trusts him and he's getting open. No reason he wouldn't feed Andre too.

Re: This week Bradford missed a lot - 5 months ago

Quotedodgerram Quotemoklerman QuoteLesBaker I was there. He didn't do a good job. He copped a lower than average v. the Bucs QB rating. Lower than average YPA v. the Bucs. Lower than YPG v. the Bucs. Lower than average completion % v. the Bucs. And he had the support of a running game that did better with the run than what the Bucs average giving up. This game should give you pause. It was

Re: Breakout versus Exploits versus Accountability - 5 months ago

QuoteBumRap I see no reason that Quick could not have been as impactful as any of our starting rookies. Then you haven't been watching him play when he's had his chances. Quick is the only one holding him(self) back.

Re: This week Bradford missed a lot - 5 months ago

QuoteLesBaker I was there. He didn't do a good job. He copped a lower than average v. the Bucs QB rating. Lower than average YPA v. the Bucs. Lower than YPG v. the Bucs. Lower than average completion % v. the Bucs. And he had the support of a running game that did better with the run than what the Bucs average giving up. This game should give you pause. It was the WORST pass defense in the

Re: Well, then leave the 80 yarder in it - 5 months ago

Quotedodgerram The int was a very bad pass for example.It was the right read and a good decision and as usual, Bradford got little help from his receiver. It isn't Bradford's fault that Amendola couldn't separate from the DB or get position. DA's not going to win too many one on one battles for the ball though I guess so was it a bad throw or just bad design to have him isolated down the sideli

Re: Thats interesting - 6 months ago

From what I could find out the last time the subject came up, the Cardinal and Gold helmets/colors were at most a one game occurrence during that season. I don't have any documentation, I was just curious about it too.

Re: To sum the Bradford "debate" up for me - 6 months ago

QuotedodgerramRams must provide him with a true Nr. 1 WR, a TE and an upgrade at o-line. And they must do that NOW in this offseason. They have the draft picks to make it right. Then the excuses MUST stop and if he then still is just a JAG with no consistency the Rams should reconsider their committment to Nr. 8.Is it really any wonder that there are consistency issues if they need all of that?

Re: why does Bernie write these articles - 7 months ago

QuoteSpeed_Kills in response to those wackos on the PD boards the eyes don't lie... we can see that Luck is a much more impactful QB than Sam Didn't Reggie Wayne play for the 1-15 Colts last year... now the Colts are 6-3 because of him and not Luck. Hmmm ... Brandon Lylod love Bradford so much he raced of to NE The Rams have a QB that is not playing like the #1 pick in the Colts do

Re: It was an NFL decision - 7 months ago

QuoteBlue and Gold not players or front office. The said, and I think this is league wide, only 2 pants colors from 2012 on.They could make it really easy and just go back to 1. Gold.

Re: Agreed, logistically...a UK team will not work.. - 7 months ago

Didn't the last game played in Mexico draw 100,000+? SF vs. AZ was the last one, wasn't it?